Difference between revisions of "Talk:Content issue"

From Blender for Architecture
Jump to: navigation, search
(Gothic woman)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
:Thanks. I deleted the link.
 
:Thanks. I deleted the link.
 
 
:I have no helicopter model in stock now. Sorry.
 
:I have no helicopter model in stock now. Sorry.
 +
:--[[User:Eon|Eon]] 21:59, 18 October 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
== Gothic woman ==
 +
 +
The model Gothic woman [http://blender-archi.tuxfamily.org/Image:Gothic_woman.blend] is not freely licensed, it has several restrictions on use in addition to the CC-BY license. [[User:Debolaz|Debolaz]] 12:19, 28 December 2007 (CET)
 +
:Having looked through a few models, I see that several has additional restrictions on use. If you intend to keep these models, you could remove CC-* license tags on them so it can be recognized that they are not in fact CC licensed? [[User:Debolaz|Debolaz]] 12:24, 28 December 2007 (CET)
 +
::I wonder if I shouldn't remove theses files then, as they are on the way to make this repository less "free". --[[User:Eon|Eon]] 14:56, 3 January 2008 (CET)

Latest revision as of 13:56, 3 January 2008

Hello, great site! I'm looking to use Blender to show off our portable architecture at mobilecabin.jp (under construction now).

But I discovered some spam in your site. The link "Mariano Hidalgo Website" under Scripts >> Web resources is a spam link. The content is spam and it loads annoying spam images and keeps reloading, also danger it has a popup though Firefox blocked that.

P.S. I'd like to find if possible a free blender model of a helicopter (i.e. to show it picking up our light one-box smart mobile office like an air crane) if you know of any. Also hope to show it embedded in photos in nature, city areas, on a roof / parking lot, etc.

Good luck!

Matt Rosin

Thanks. I deleted the link.
I have no helicopter model in stock now. Sorry.
--Eon 21:59, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Gothic woman

The model Gothic woman [1] is not freely licensed, it has several restrictions on use in addition to the CC-BY license. Debolaz 12:19, 28 December 2007 (CET)

Having looked through a few models, I see that several has additional restrictions on use. If you intend to keep these models, you could remove CC-* license tags on them so it can be recognized that they are not in fact CC licensed? Debolaz 12:24, 28 December 2007 (CET)
I wonder if I shouldn't remove theses files then, as they are on the way to make this repository less "free". --Eon 14:56, 3 January 2008 (CET)