Difference between revisions of "Talk:Textures"
From Blender for Architecture
m |
(Think about PD-license ! Easier to handle.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could we add the addresses of the best texture sites in this section ? | Could we add the addresses of the best texture sites in this section ? | ||
:For sure --[[User:Eon|Eon]] 16:46, 8 July 2006 (CEST) | :For sure --[[User:Eon|Eon]] 16:46, 8 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Done the first one : L. A."Lemog" one I use for all my quick work but it's worth a better treatment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:IamInnocent|IamInnocent]] 02:33, 10 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hi! Is it possible, that you consider a PD-self licence? I would find it much more practical for those, who would like to use them, because if you have to build a scene with one hundred different materials, you have to give credit to all, who have made a single picture. I would like to contribute my graphics and textures under PD, so that everyone has the most freeness to use them. Else you have to make a list, who did contribute to your .blend with cc-by, GPL, Free-Art and so forth. --[[User:Ping|Ping]] 08:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:15, 19 May 2008
Could we add the addresses of the best texture sites in this section ?
- For sure --Eon 16:46, 8 July 2006 (CEST)
Done the first one : L. A."Lemog" one I use for all my quick work but it's worth a better treatment.
--IamInnocent 02:33, 10 July 2006 (CEST)
Hi! Is it possible, that you consider a PD-self licence? I would find it much more practical for those, who would like to use them, because if you have to build a scene with one hundred different materials, you have to give credit to all, who have made a single picture. I would like to contribute my graphics and textures under PD, so that everyone has the most freeness to use them. Else you have to make a list, who did contribute to your .blend with cc-by, GPL, Free-Art and so forth. --Ping 08:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)